A lack of interview invitations does not always mean you lack experience. The problem may be how the CV positions that experience, how closely it matches the vacancy or how easily a recruiter can identify your value.
1. The target role is unclear
A CV that tries to suit every position often sounds unfocused. State a clear professional identity and adapt the document to a realistic role family.
2. The summary is generic
Phrases such as hard-working and team player do not differentiate you. Use the summary to communicate level, specialisation, evidence and direction.
3. Responsibilities dominate
Job duties explain what the position required. Achievements explain how well you performed it. Include improvements, scale and outcomes.
4. Important keywords are missing
Use accurate terminology from the occupation and vacancy. Recruiters may search databases using job titles, tools, certifications and methods.
5. The strongest information is buried
Place the most relevant experience, qualifications and achievements where they can be found quickly. Do not force the reader through unrelated detail first.
6. Formatting creates ATS problems
Complex tables, graphics, icons and text boxes can affect extraction. Use a clean document with standard headings and selectable text.
7. The CV contains unsupported claims
Replace broad claims with evidence. Show where you led, improved, delivered, reduced, built or influenced something.
8. The application is too broad
Applying to unrelated roles weakens relevance. Concentrate on vacancies where your experience solves the employer's stated problems.
9. LinkedIn contradicts the CV
Dates, titles and positioning should be consistent. Recruiters often compare both sources.
10. Errors reduce trust
Spelling mistakes, inconsistent dates and broken formatting suggest limited attention to detail. Review the PDF on desktop and mobile before submitting.
Request a free CV review to identify the highest-impact improvements for your next application.